Previous topic :: Next topic |
yemDX Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 46
Localisation: USA
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 00:16 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
lol no u have 2 defeat IST first xD then u fite MS! _________________ hiho |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nano | PipKinG Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 21 May 2010 Posts: 6
Localisation: Kleve - Germany
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 00:39 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yemDX Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 46
Localisation: USA
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 00:41 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
u have 2 have a clanwar w/ IST and win b4 u face MS, to show ur worthy >_____< _________________ hiho |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nano | PipKinG Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 21 May 2010 Posts: 6
Localisation: Kleve - Germany
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 00:55 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
I dont think so. we are worthy Nano is atm one of the best instagib clans. There are not many clans which are better. So we don't have to fight vs. IST and if ms don't want, we wouldnt be sad, because there are enough other clans in teeworlds. But our decision of a cw enemy was ms, because they are maybe good enough to beat us and they are fair. At least it's MS' decision |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yemDX Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 46
Localisation: USA
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 02:36 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
but ms does want u to fight IST _________________ hiho |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Publicité
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 02:36 Post subject: Publicité |
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nano | PipKinG Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 21 May 2010 Posts: 6
Localisation: Kleve - Germany
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 02:50 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
Nano vs. MS or nothing We ask ms for cw & not "IST" :P |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Jini Admin
Offline
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 08:51 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
I'm in unless it is ctf4 only. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Tho Admin
Offline
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1,181
Localisation: France
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 10:31 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
Nano | PipKinG wrote: | Nano is atm one of the best instagib clans. |
Haha, but isn't it the only one left ? :>
I (and I know it's at least Eve's case too) stopped giving a damn about instagib when it stopped being challenging, and thus hugely boring. And that was long time ago. Now the few times we're playing, it's even more confirmed by the fact that there are only ctf4 servers left and that all the wannabegood players are still not that good, even on their worshipped ctf4.
So that would have been a good idea a year ago. Now, you won't find more than Jini and zer0 to play with, and both hate ctf4. Good luck. _________________ Vice. Suffering. Destruction.
Behold bastard son, I am the evil one ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Eve Admin
Offline
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2,926
Localisation: France, Paris
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 10:41 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
Nano | PipKinG wrote: | Nano is atm one of the best instagib clans. |
I honestly don't know which clan is the best iCTF clan atm. Why ? Because in my opinion, all active clans are CTF4 only clans. I don't count krypton as an active clan by the way (love to bärli, sky, and xake btw, miss you guys). So unless you guys prove to be able to play in a manner on both CTF4, CTF2, test11, CTF4_new, lava, medieval etc, I can't consider your offer as a serious one.
Yours sincerly, with all my unfaithful love, _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Shubi Monkey
Offline
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 242
Localisation: Germany
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 12:03 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
Well to be honest I've become a vanilla player.
It's just disgusting to check the iCTF-Servers and only to find ctf4 servers. Of course skill matters, even on ctf4 it's important, but the small areas, the bounces, the spawningpoints, the movement etc. just make it impressively hateful to play. For this reason I stopped playing iCTF. In vanilla there are still people playing ctf2 eventhough the majority sticks to ctf5. I dont like ctf5 that much but its still far better than ctf4 and I seriously enjoy some games.
In addition I'd be freaking happy if someone hosted a CTF-Server with test11, ctf2 and lava
General Fail over and out.
PS:
You guys know under which synonym you can find me, I'll also try to be more active in IRC soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Publicité
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 12:03 Post subject: Publicité |
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Jini Admin
Offline
Joined: 30 Aug 2009 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 12:16 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
~{MS}~ Shubi wrote: | In addition I'd be freaking happy if someone hosted a CTF-Server with test11, ctf2 and lava |
Both HuH and my server have those. The problem is that no one plays there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Zongo Admin
Offline
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1,651
Localisation: Zongoland
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 12:18 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
~{MS}~ Jini wrote: | I'm in unless it is ctf4 only. |
+1 _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ Shubi Monkey
Offline
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 242
Localisation: Germany
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 12:25 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
~{MS}~ Jini wrote: |
~{MS}~ Shubi wrote: | In addition I'd be freaking happy if someone hosted a CTF-Server with test11, ctf2 and lava
|
Both HuH and my server have those. The problem is that no one plays there.
|
That'd explain why my filter always kicks them out ('Has people playing') |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~{MS}~ zer0 Monkey
Offline
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 202
Localisation: Austria
|
Posted: Mon 2 Aug 2010, 20:54 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
i dont care, i'm with the majority
~{MS}~ Eve wrote: | So unless you guys prove to be able to play in a manner on both CTF4, CTF2, test11, CTF4_new, lava, medieval etc, I can't consider your offer as a serious one.
|
/agree |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nano | PipKinG Diddy Kong
Offline
Joined: 21 May 2010 Posts: 6
Localisation: Kleve - Germany
|
Posted: Tue 3 Aug 2010, 14:17 Post subject: Nano vs. ~{MS}~ |
|
|
|
I don't say that we only want to play ctf4 :P
My first question was if MS got enough time for a clanwar. If you answer me this question with "yes", we'll talk about maps and other things :P |
|
Back to top |
|
|